In response to an earlier proposal on the Polkadot forum: https://forum.polkadot.network/t/ux-proposal-consensus-based-address-formats/6072
I think this is a good suggestion. As Bifrost is an active parachain , we can also follow up on the suggestions in this proposal and update our address format in UX to a more universal address format with stronger consensus.
I suggest that the address format on the UX of both Bifrost-polkadot and Bifrost-kusama networks be modified uniformly.
For Prefix, choose to use the prefix:0 of the Polkadot relay chain.
Because when users come into contact with Polkadot, they often first acquire DOT assets, or interact with system parallel chains such as Assethub. These chains currently show as prefix:0 on polkadot.js. So I think prefix:0 is the address format with the strongest consensus.
The update of the address display format will not make any changes to the chain, nor will it affect any services on the current chain, but it involves a wide range of areas that need to be modified to maintain consistency, mainly in the following :
Execution time: 2024-09-18 10:00 UTC+0
Execution time: 2024-09-18 10:00 UTC+0
(It is recommended to synchronize, but it depends on the actual external communication and implementation. It can be allowed to be implemented later.)
Since the entire proposal has not yet formed a broad consensus in the ecosystem, we can first update the non-on-chain content related to UX. We should be more cautious about on-chain information, and we can temporarily not update the relevant chainspecs.
Since the proposal content is completely an off-chain operation, the proposal is marked for execution by remarking the link of this proposal post and a simple description on the chain.