Please update your ref, we can't vote on this ...

[@Stake Plus/CL](bxEyRfXr5NwbC4ytFcQXEkPjNg13NnkLN5UjstXnL1X1rjV-bifrost-polkadot) 
Hey, Tom! 

Sorry for the confusion on this. Mark submitted both validator addresses so that the Bifrost team could pick one, not necessarily nominate both. I've been trying to stay offline this week, but I heard about this while voluntarily attending our weekly cadence call. 

Looks like already removed your nay vote, though. Still wanted to comment to help clarify. Hope you and your family are enjoying the holidays!

Cheers,

Phunky

This proposal is a resubmission of [Referendum #66](https://bifrost.subsquare.io/democracy/referenda/66) based upon the positive comments received in [LuckyFriday's Validator Boost Proposal discussion](https://bifrost.subsquare.io/posts/3).

calls

Executed

Submitted

DecisionStarted

DecisionDepositPlaced

ConfirmStarted

Confirmed

validator_election

LuckyFriday: Validator Boost Proposal

candidates

members

proficients

fellows

senior_fellows

experts

senior_experts

masters

senior_masters

grand_masters

root

whitelisted_caller

fellowship_admin

referendum_canceller

referendum_killer

liquid_staking

system_staking_admin

salp_admin

treasury_spend

Origin able to dispatch a whitelisted call.

Origin for managing the composition of the fellowship.

Origin for managing validator node of SLP protocol.